Erdington and Shrewsbury MPs under-fire for non-attendance

Apr 9 2009 by Edward Chadwick, Birmingham Post

Two Midland MPs have been named as among the worst elected representatives in the country who have failed to show up for large numbers of Commons committees.

Sion Simon, the Labour MP for Erdington, managed to get to just 29.7 per cent of meetings of the treasury committee.

Although he became the Government’s Further Education Minister in October, figures released by Parliament show he attended only 11 of 37 meetings in the 12 months to November 2008.

Shrewsbury’s Tory MP Daniel Kawczynski is listed as present at just 12.5 per cent of the justice committee and 31.3 per cent of the international development committee.

He has claimed the figures are wrong.

At least 60 of 220 members on the most powerful committees examining public spending and services have missed at least half of all meetings in the last year.

The figure has sparked concern among select committee chairmen that MPs are shirking responsibilities and failing to properly hold government to account.

Phil Willis, chairman of the Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee, said: “I think it is the job of members to attend.”

Commons committees are cross-party groups responsible for scrutinising public expenditure and policies. They are made up of mainly back-bench MPs.

Mr Simon said: ‘‘It is a ridiculous non-story. It’s like saying every MP should be in the Chamber for every debate. Select committees do not work like that. They are just one of a range of tools MPs can use. There is no reason whatsoever to priorities select committee meetings above the other work of an MP.

“I pick my meetings and was an active and effective member of the committee. I work for the people of Erdington and the Labour Government; not the Treasury Select Committee.’’

Mr Kawczynski did not respond to calls to his office but told The Times the figure for his attendance at the international development committee was wrong and that he had not attended the justice committee because the two clashed.

Meanwhile, Birmingham MP Gisela Stuart defended foreign trips by Commons committee members to sunny climes which have cost taxpayers £1.3 million in the last year alone.

Committee members have jetted off to California, Bali, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands on overseas “fact-finding” trips.

One MP went on 11 foreign visits last year. The Taxpayer’s Alliance has said the amount of money lavished on foreign trips seemed “excessive and frivolous”.

Edgbaston MP Mrs Stuart’s foreign affairs committee spent £231,023 last year on foreign trips, including the Caribbean holiday island of Bermuda.

But the back-bench Labour MP said her visit to the Falkland Islands as part of the committee’s work last May was modest and involved little luxury.

“We flew most of the way by military plane and stayed in fairly basic bed and breakfast accommodation,” she said. “It was far from lavish or excessive.

“The trip to Bermuda led to the suspension of the government in the Turks and Caicos Islands because of corruption.

“These trips cost a lot of money but if you were to ask me whether the trips provided good value, then the answer would be yes.”

Other trips included a £48,000 junket to South Africa by the justice committee to look at the role of the prison officer abroad.

Matthew Elliott, of the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “Every parliamentary trip should be scrutinised to see if it is really worthwhile.”

Broken Britain – A Genuine Picture?

Sometimes when reading the letters pages of the local press, one can be given a rather depressing and nihilistic view of the world. Often, the same narrow band of correspondents are pushing an intolerant view of life, choosing to focus upon that which divides society rather than what brings us together.

Other times, those with a particular axe to grind will seek to make political capital out of isolated national tragedies far from Shrewsbury. A recent instance is David Cameron’s ‘Broken Britain’ claims following the child violence case in South Yorkshire.

Personally I prefer to concentrate on the facts, and recognise that not all was well in the good old days. For example the number of violent deaths among children in England and Wales fell by almost 40% in the past 30 years, or nearly 50% when taking into account growth in the child population, according to the recent report by Bournemouth University.

Improvements in social care systems, along with a greater focus on child poverty, had helped lower the death rate. Thirty years ago England and Wales were the third or fourth highest child killers in the western world, but we’re now fourth lowest.

These national tragedies are terrible and one violent death of a child is too many but this research clearly proves the way to protect children’s lives is to invest in our social care systems, fight child poverty and support those families who need it.

To consider cutting initiatives such as Labour’s Sure Start scheme, which provides health, education, parenting and employment services to pre-school children and parents, is in my opinion, bordering on the cruel.

I hope our Tory MP Daniel Kawczynski will confirm that he will back our four Shrewsbury Sure Start centres in Monkmoor, Crowmoor, Harlescott and Meole Brace, and not permit any cuts in their funding laid out nationally by his own party.

School Places Solution Vital

The problem of surplus school places in Shropshire is back on the front page (Shropshire Star 2nd Feb). Now the spotlight has moved on to our secondary schools, which are reported to be facing large reductions in pupil numbers over the next 5-6 years.  This issue has been central to school funding in our County in recent years. To be fair to the controlling Tory group on the former County Council, they did recently attempt to tackle surplus numbers in the primary sector.  Sadly, rank and file Tory Councillors when faced with the inevitable angry protests buckled under the pressure, and appeared more concerned with the approaching unitary elections than with making progress on the matter.

Well, the problem has not gone away. I fully appreciate, and sympathise, with village residents concerned about the risk of closure to their school. On top of the loss of the local shop, pub and bus service this can seem like the last straw. But we must all accept small rural schools cannot be considered in isolation. Surplus places kept open mean less funding for the rest of our schools, including those in both village and town.

In my opinion what is required is an approach that considers the whole of our school system, and whilst listening fully to the people,  is not then derailed by narrow local electoral considerations. The issue is very emotive and inevitably supporters of some schools will be disappointed. The ruling Conservatives on Shropshire Council face some very tough decisions on the matter, but to do nothing is no longer an option.

What was not acceptable was the stance of certain prominent local Tories, who sought to blame the Labour Government for Shropshire’s surplus place problem. Spouting misleading and  inaccurate claims will not solve the problem, and does nothing to foster the informed debate we all need to have on the subject. The funding figures per pupil are largely a product of past failures to tackle the surplus place problem. No Government, of whatever party, is going to pay us to maintain significant numbers of empty desks.

If the same people repeat these claims now, they will truly have exposed themselves to be unable to understand simple mathematics, or worse, to be total cynics.

Cameron to destroy workers rights!!

David Cameron has been clever to say he will NOT get rid of the minimum wage. But what he wants to do is cut your rights at work hoping that you think it is just a load of stuff not important . Under David Cameron’s plans British workers will become the least protected in Europe. Making workers in Britain  the slaves of Europe!

Ripe for exploitation by big business.

Don’t be fooled!!

Dear Mr Cameron,  In December we delivered a Christmas Card calling on you to reverse your plans to pull the UK out of the Social Chapter and destroy the many rights that support families’  work life balance – a subject you have talked about at length in the press.  Only weeks later, it seems that you have revealed your true intentions. In the Daily Telegraph (9 January 2010) you openly praised Margaret Thatcher’s authoritarian anti-union legislation and even threatened to go further to dilute workers’ rights.  We think you are wrong – and that the way to support families in this country is to recognise that rights at work matter. You may pretend to have our interests at heart, but the facts are clear.   Your plans to pull out of the Social Chapter will undermine our legal guarantees to:  •	Four weeks paid holiday •	The right to be consulted about changes at work and our entitlement to parental leave •	Equality between men and women in the labour market and at work •	Social security and social protection for workers •	Protection of workers where their employment contract is terminated •	A minimum of 26 weeks maternity leave for women, and two weeks for men •	The Temporary Agency Workers directive, which will ensure that 1.3 million workers for these agencies will be given pay and paid holidays comparable to the equivalent full-time employee doing the same job. •	Laws to ensure that workers retain basic employment, pension and seniority rights if their company is taken over  We want you to come clean with the public and tell us why you think it’s a good idea to scrap Britain’s guarantee to these rights by pulling out of the Social Chapter.  Yours sincerely,  Byron Taylor

Fighters and Believers (Video)

Next Page »

Subscribe to my RSS Feed
www.flickr.com
JonTandy's items Go to JonTandy's photostream
One of 496 websites proudly supporting Earth Hour. On WordPress? Get the plugin.